Ensuring the investigated information’s accuracy, currency, and reliability is essential in nursing research. The healthcare landscape undergoes continuous changes with the emergence of new research and evidence. When nurses encounter an unfamiliar diagnosis or condition, they must collect the requisite information to ensure the patient’s safe treatment (Nazanin Alipourfard et al., 2021). It is crucial to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources to optimize patient outcomes. The provision of high-quality evidence is essential and can be achieved through the utilization of reliable information resources. A nurse at Vila Health encounters a patient with preeclampsia, a diagnosis that she is unfamiliar with. This paper aims to elucidate the criteria for assessing the credibility of journal articles and websites on preeclampsia.
Also Read
BHA-FPX4006 Assessment 1: Compliance Program Implementation and Ethical Decision Making
Preeclampsia
The presence of established standards for the management of preeclampsia in hospitals is not universal. According to recent findings by the World Health Organization (WHO), preeclampsia is estimated to be responsible for around 70,000 maternal fatalities yearly worldwide (EL sebaey Soliman et al., 2021). Preeclampsia and high blood pressure are significant medical concerns that need prompt and proper intervention. Preeclampsia may be characterized by systolic blood pressure (SBP) equal to or more than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) equal to or greater than 90 mmHg, accompanied by proteinuria, with or without signs or symptoms. Alternatively, preeclampsia may also manifest via the appearance of signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities, even in the absence of proteinuria. Blood pressure control measures are the most effective strategy in mitigating the risk of stroke-related mortality in women diagnosed with preeclampsia. The expeditious initiation of therapy to reduce blood pressure levels can significantly reduce maternal morbidity and fatality rates.
Criteria of Resources
When conducting research, it is essential to identify the most reliable sources of information. Selecting appropriate resources from the vast array of journals and scientific publications available online and in databases can be overwhelming. However, it is essential to prioritize peer-reviewed, relevant, and reliable sources.National organizations, government entities, and medical institutions publish the most reliable sources of evidence (Nazanin Alipourfard et al., 2021). When conducting research, it is crucial to prioritize articles that have undergone peer review in the past five years. Peer review is a widely used approach to guarantee and evaluate the excellence of academic research. When conducting research, it is crucial to utilize a database that facilitates the discovery of relevant articles. Capella University utilizes various search engines, including Summon, PubMed, and Medline.
Analysis of the Credibility and Relevance
Evidence-based practice strives to deliver safe and effective care by identifying hazards and providing current information on treatments and regimens. Numerous studies and research have been conducted to determine the optimal approach to managing patients with preeclampsia. Maternal mortality is the second leading cause of death among women, and implementing evidence-based treatments can reduce the risk or severity of health outcomes for both mothers and newborns (Portney, 2019). Credible and relevant sources will be identified based on the Nursing Research Pyramid. The Pyramid is a hierarchical representation of visual evidence, wherein the credibility of information increases as one moves up from the bottom to the top. Case-control studies, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, critically appraised articles, critically assessed individuals, and systematic reviews positioned at the apex of the hierarchy represent the most dependable sources.
A study by Alnuaimi et al. (2020) discovered a reputable and relevant source that examined the effects of an interventional program on the knowledge of high-risk preeclampsia among Jordanian women and its impact on pregnancy outcomes. A randomized controlled study was conducted in a publicly funded healthcare facility in Jordan. The findings demonstrated a statistically significant disparity in average scores about knowledge of preeclampsia between the group that received the intervention and the control group after the educational Place your order