According to the University of Texas at Austin (n.d.), moral awareness is “perceiving the ethical dimension of an issue that they face” (1:04). The concept highlights that every situation we face has a moral component, and without moral awareness, people could accidentally make the incorrect decision by focusing on other issues and ignoring possible ethical considerations. Furthermore, studies on selective attention show that people tend to perceive what they expect. This attention can obscure or blind people to immoral behaviors or acts, implying that focusing too much on specific features could lead them to overlook critical ethical problems (The University of Texas at Austin, n.d.).
Supportive Evidence
PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4: Susan’s approach to the issue with Mark shows moral awareness. Susan recognizes the ethical significance of correcting the misconception when she discovers Mark believes they are in a relationship. She knows that it would be unjust to keep Mark under the erroneous assumption and that explaining their situation is the best course of action. To avoid deceiving him and respect his sentiments, Susan chooses to openly describe the issue on Facebook before unfriending him, indicating her dedication to ethical behavior despite the possible unpleasantness of the encounter.
Mark’s inability to see the immoral measures he took was certainly evidence of selective attention. Because he has such a fascination with Susan, he confuses her glances and polite conversations and sees what he expects to see. Susan, according to Mark, expressed her interest in him and returned his sentiments at the party. According to Bringle et al. (2013), unreciprocated love causes the would-be lover to need greater love from the other person, as seen by Mark’s Facebook posts. Mark’s selective attention to Susan caused him to focus on the steps required to attain his ambitions, and as a result, he acted unethically by expressing his love without first contacting Susan or considering her point of view.
Application of Fairmindedness
Fairmindedness Issue
Elder and Frank (2020) describe fairmindedness as the ability to assess all relevant views objectively, without allowing personal prejudices or interests to sway one’s judgment. They emphasize that, while reaching real fairmindedness is difficult owing to innate egocentrism and prejudices, aiming for it is essential for building strong critical thinking abilities. This effort helps people avoid being easily deceived or influenced by ensuring that all points of view are fairly treated in decision-making processes.
Supportive Evidence
Susan demonstrates fairmindedness by carefully examining both her own and Mark’s opinions. After spotting Mark’s posts (PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4), she takes a step back to consider his point of view, realizing that he could have misunderstood her kind gestures as love desire. Susan finds a mix of empathy and the desire to clear up the misunderstanding by acknowledging his sentiments and expressing thanks for the celebration while openly setting boundaries. Her approach demonstrates a dedication to justice and respect, ensuring that both sides of the issue are examined and appropriate limits are set.
Conclusion
Unrequited love can create complicated issues that influence everyone’s emotions, self-esteem, and morals. Susan’s position exemplifies these challenges perfectly. She noticed Mark’s concerns and made efforts to handle the problem ethically and equitably. She used moral awareness to recognize the importance of publicly clarifying her views to avoid additional misunderstandings. Her objective attitude enabled her to perceive the problem from Mark’s eyes while still defending her own boundaries. Susan’s actions demonstrate her ability to handle unrequited love with empathy and critical thought, ensuring that both her own and Mark’s emotions are honored in a difficult situation.
References
PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4: Baumeister, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2020).Social psychology and human nature (5th ed.). Cengage Limited. https://capella.vitalsource.com/books/9780357713754
PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4: Baumeister, R. F., Wotman, S. R., & Stillwell, A. M. (1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.377
PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4: Bringle, R. G., Winnick, T., & Rydell, R. J. (2013). The prevalence and nature of&nbs
Place your order