Introduction
In the late 1990s the public raised concern on the extent at which investigators and the IRBs were adhering to the federal regulations that protect human research. The public were calling for the reorganization and refocusing of various government units responsible for the regulatory oversight on issues related to health (Peter, 2018). These policies majored on regulating the conduct of healthcare professionals and offering better healthcare outcome.
Accreditation Compliance
This is a voluntary certification that institutions, programs or facilities have adhered to the set standard of protection in healthcare. This compliance certifies that a particular institution has met the required certain specified by the board. The accreditation compliance implies that healthcare institution has met the required certifications that allows the to dispense healthcare services within a particular setting (Peter, 2018). Accredited healthcare organizations are able to mitigate various risks that arise in the healthcare sector.
Ethical Consideration
Ethical framework governing healthcare workers allows nurses to act as advocates for patients and find a balance of delivering effective care. Ethical consideration allows patients to have their rights in making their decisions based on beliefs and values. Breaching any of the ethical principles may attract heavy disciplinary penalties from the council. Healthcare professional need to understand these ethical considerations to reduce the impact of these penalties on both a healthcare worker and healthcare organization (Murray et al., 2018). The healthcare provider has the obligation of explaining the health status to the patient and gain their consent of the required medical operations. Therefore, adhering to the ethical standards reduces legal complications.
Risks and Consequences of Non-Compliance
The potential risk involved in these areas is far-reaching. While the risks may be ranging with the type of non-compliance, both employers and employees are at risk. The non-compliance leaves an institution at the risk of license revocations, financial losses, security breaches, poor patient care, decreased trust, business disruptions and damaging reputation (Murray et al., 2018). The fines and penalties of non-compliance might be costly ending up affecting the entire operations of the healthcare unit. Various departments like HIPPA, Department of Human Services (HHS) and Office of the Civil Rights (OCR) would be ready to penalize the institution according to the magnitude of noncompliance.
Lawsuits and Settlement of Non-Compliance
After the fines and penalties on any healthcare worker or institution, non-compliance would as well trigger lawsuits. These cases come with heavy legal fees that would have adverse impact on the financial status of the company. If the employees are the non-compliant, the cost of settling the suits would be high implying that healthcare institutions must be ready to say no for malpractice (Murray et al., 2018). Therefore, the impending cost of selling noncompliance suits always compel healthcare institutions to remain vigilant on compliance issues. The training of employees on these issues limits a company from facing such court cases that might affect the normal operations of healthcare institutions.
Important Healthcare Regulations
Today, federal, state, and local authorities and other various regulatory agencies have established rules intended to protect the public, promote access to care, and ensure that medical professionals both adhere to high standards and receive the compensation that is their due (Murray et al., 2018). Some of the important healthcare regulations include, HIPPA and The HITECH act. Health care managers and leaders are must be familiar with laws, regulations, and the associated organizational policies and procedures that reinforce compliance. The government has availed enough resources to enhance comprehension of laws, regulations, and steps to take when suspected or actual incidents occur.
HIPPA
The passing of HIPAA in 1996 had a primary goal of introducing efficiency in health care delivery and more health insurance coverage. The three major provisions at that time were tax provisions, portability provisions, and administrative simplification provisions. The congress has little concern for privacy rights at the onset, which prompted them to pass on the responsibility of privacy protections to the HHS. Four iterations later took effect, including HHS issuing a propos
Place your order