Importance of Targeted Data Collection to Research Plan

Targeted data collection is crucial to a research plan as it ensures that the data collected is directly relevant to the research question being addressed. For the proposed research question of “What are the risk factors of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients, and what strategies can be implemented to increase prevention?” targeted data collection is essential to ensure that the collected data is relevant and directly addresses the research question (Ledger et al., 2020). Collecting targeted data on patient demographics such as age, gender, race, medical history, and medication reports can help identify any predisposing factors that increase the risk of pressure ulcers. Targeted data on hospitalization history, including length of stay, bed rest, and the reason for readmission, and electronic health records can help identify factors that may increase pressure ulcers in patients (Cramer et al., 2019). Collecting targeted data on pressure ulcer occurrence among hospitalized patients can help determine the extent of the problem and identify areas where prevention strategies can be implemented. Collecting targeted data on the strategies implemented to prevent pressure ulcers, such as repositioning, skincare, and pressure relief devices, can help determine their effectiveness and identify areas for improvement (Gaspar et al., 2019). Treatment methods and targeted data on the treatment methods used to manage pressure ulcers, such as wound care, antibiotics, and pain management, can help identify effective treatment methods and areas for improvement. By collecting targeted data in these areas, researchers can better understand the factors for pressure ulcer occurrence in hospitalized patients and identify effective strategies for prevention (Boyko et al., 2018).

Potential Challenges

Collecting data for pressure ulcer prevention in hospitalized patients can pose several challenges that researchers must consider. The challenges in collecting data for preventing pressure ulcers need to consider ethical issues carefully. Patients with pressure ulcers are a vulnerable population who may experience pain and discomfort, making it difficult for them to fully understand the purpose of the research and provide informed consent (Mohd, 2018). Additionally, patients with pressure ulcers may be more susceptible to infection. They may have compromised immune systems, which requires researchers to take appropriate measures to protect their privacy and confidentiality during data analysis (Mohd, 2018).

Conclusion

In BHA FPX4010 Assessment 2 Qualitative Research Questions and Methods offer a range of data collection tools, such as observation, document analysis, case studies, interviews, and ethnography. These methods are highly flexible and adaptable to the research question and context, allowing for a deeper understanding and interpretation of complex phenomena. In the context of the research question on pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients, targeted data collection using in-depth interviews, surveys, and focus groups can provide rich and detailed information on risk factors and prevention strategies. It is important to carefully select appropriate data collection methods to ensure that the research question is effectively addressed and the findings are meaningful.

References

Andrews, M. (2020). Quality indicators in narrative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769241 Bereded, D. T., Salih, M. H., & Abebe, A. E. (2018). Prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcer in hospitalized adult patients; A single-center study from Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3948-7 Boyko, T. V., Longaker, M. T., & Yang, G. P. (2018). Review of the current management of pressure ulcers. Advances in Wound Care, 7(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2016.0697 Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z Cramer, E. M., Seneviratne, M. G., Sharifi, H., Ozturk, A., & Hernandez-Boussard, T. (2019). Predicting the incidence of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit using machine learning. EGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to Improve Patient Outcomes), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.307 Dalglish, S. L., Khalid, H., & McMahon, S. A. (2020). Document analysis in health policy research: The READ approach. Health Policy and Planning, 35(10). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa064 Gaspar, S., Peralta, M., Marques, A., Budri, A., & Gaspar de Matos, M. (2019). Effectiveness on hospital‐acquired pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review. International Wound Journal, 16(5), 1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13147 Han, D., Heshmat, Y., Geiskkovitch, D. Y., Tan, Z., & Neustaedter, C. (2022). A scenario-based study of doctors and patients on video conferencing appointments from home. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514234 Jaul, E., Barron, J., Rosenzweig, J. P., & Menczel, J. (2018). An overview of co-morbidities and the development of pressure ulcers among older adults. BMC Geriatrics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0997-7 Ledger, L., Worsley, P., Hope, J., & Schoonhoven, L. (2020). Patient involvement in pressure ulcer prevention and adherence to prevention strategies: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 101, 103449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103449 Lindhardt, C. L., Beck, S. H., & Ryg, J. (2020). Nursing care for older patients with pressure ulcers: A qualitative study. Nursing Open, 7(4), 1020–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.474