Policy Name: Quality Improvement Projects Policy and Procedures | ||
Approved: | ||
Effective Date:01/27/2012 | Page 1 of 2 | Section: HRPP 3.8 |
/Replaced Policy: 10/01/2010 |
Video on QI vs. Research
MUSC IRB HRPP 3.8 Quality Improvement Projects Policy and Procedures
HRPP 3.8 Quality Improvement Projects Policy and Procedures
III. PROCEDURES
A. Overview of the differences between QI and Research
(See box to the left.)
B. Issues to Consider
1. What often distinguishes QI activities from research is whether the activities are intended or designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. For purposes of this policy, "generalizable knowledge" is information (findings) that can be applied to populations or situations beyond those eing immediately studied.
2. If there are no intentions to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge, IRB review is not required.
3. If QI activities are a systematic investigation AND will develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge, IRB review is required. It is important to note that at the onset, many QI projects have only local (organizational) improvement intentions, but during the process of data collection or analysis, it becomes clear that findings could be generalizable or benefit others. IRB review should occur when there is an intention to make findings generalizable.
4. When an IRB Chair, designee or IRB staff member cannot in all fairness decide or agree on whether a submission is research or QI, that application may be referred to the full board for discussion and vote.
C. The QI project must be submitted to the IRB if any of the following are true:
1. there is an intent to use the data to contribute to generalizable knowledge,
2. there is a random assignment of participants to compare outcomes,
3. the activities are not normally done as part of standard operating procedures,
4. results will be used to apply knowledge to other programs outside the institution,
5. the project is subject to peer review (designed to be used outside of the institution),
6. anonymity of participants cannot be assured, or
7. the activities involve more than minimal risk to participants.
D. If an investigator is unsure as to whether or not the project meets, or does not meet, the definitions above, please consult with the IRB.