Types of problem statements
As the previous section illustrated, there are different kinds of problem statements that can be used to establish the novelty of a study. Three common types of statements are detailed in this section.
Empirical problem statement
In many cases, researchers can argue that scientific theory might lack sufficient evidence. Theory that has been established in one context (e.g., high school classrooms), for example, may not have evidence to be considered applicable to another context (e.g., university classrooms), requiring further research to affirm or challenge that theory.
Theoretical problem statement
A
theoretical framework is simply a way of looking at data to generate knowledge. When you change the theory, you change the way you
analyze the research. As a result, a problem statement that illustrates a focus on one particular theory can justify the use of another theory, provided it generates meaningful knowledge about your
research topic.
Methodological problem statement
Method triangulation is the concept of examining a phenomenon through multiple
research methods to gain a sufficiently robust understanding of the knowledge regarding that phenomenon. If the literature prefers one method (e.g., assessments) you can establish research novelty by conducting a study that employs another method (e.g.,
interviews) and explaining how this contributes new understanding.